If 1 amp of currentgoes into Figure 16-A , a noticeably larger magnetic field occurs than inFigure 16-B (for the same current input).

QUESTION:  Why the large difference in the strength of themagnetic field?

ANSWER: Simple. Wehave already demonstrated that the iron becomes magnetic due to atom alignment.Therefore, via the small electrical input acting as a catalyst, we have simplycaused more atoms to align in the larger mass of iron in Figure 16-A above thanin the smaller mass of iron in Figure 16-B.

If 1 amp of currentgoes into Figure 16-C, a noticeably smaller and weaker magnetic field occursthan in Figure 16-D.

ANSWER:  Simple . As we have already proven, we havemore copper atoms to align in coil 16-D than in coil 16-C.

E.  All of the facts presented in Sections 1-16clearly prove that the current (consisting of gyroscopic particles in motion) putinto a conductor simply acts as a catalyst in aligning the atoms of theconductor itself. This same catalytic effect is observed if a conductor is wrappedaround iron and the current runs through the conductor. In other words, thecurrent simply acts as a "pure catalyst!" The current input triggersthe atom alignment which resulcs in energy (gyroscopic particles) beingreleased from the atoms aligned. However , the electrical current input doesnot participate in the magnetic field released.

   如果这个公式不对，或者这个只适合原子没有被完全排列时。那么说明一个问题：

   没完全排列时，磁场的释放与输入电流的大小正相关，也就是说输入电流中的陀螺子的数量也影响着触发的磁场大小。电流太小时就只能激发很少的部分，更或者说陀螺子的路径越窄则有更多的机会激发陀螺子。

   猜想导线的粗细与激发磁场的大小也有关系，所以类似作者的纯粹只靠增加导线的重量或许还有捷径。

F.    There is another important mechanical effectof the gyroscopic particles comprising a magnetic field, electric field , andall matter, which I refer to as a "Hydraulic Effect." (See Figun:16-F I.)

lf one places apiece of Iron in a magnetic field and the source (magnet) is fixed to a pivot(see Figure 16-F1 above), then, lf the piece of iron is moved, the magnet willalso attempt ro move. It is mechanically obvious that there is a magnetic"coupling effect " generated by flowing "streams or shells"of gyroscopic particles comprising the magnetic field and originating from theatoms of the magnet. I originally asked myself: "How else could there bean action-reaction effect?" Any motion whatsoever on the part of the pieceof iron will cause an attempted motion of the magnet itself. This action is thesame type of effect as found in a hydrnulic system. (Sec Figure 16 f2.)

If the pipe isfilled wih fluid and the piston is moved, then piston 2 will also move. lf thepipe is filled with a gas and piston 1 is moved, then piston 2 will alsoattempt to move. However,enough pressure can be imposed on piston 2, causingthe gas molecules to compress into a smaller area within the pipe. The sameeffect can befound  in magnetics.

F. The same type ofhydraulic effect can be observed in the electric current (gyroscopic particles)coming from a battery or generator and flowing into a conductor to align theatoms within the conductor. The atoms of the conductor are aligned due to thepressure of the voltage from the battery or generator. The current (gyroscopicparticles) that is derived from the atoms of the material within the battery orthe atoms within the conductor and magnet of the generator is the energy whichcomprises the atoms of the material from which the current (gyroscopicparticles) originates. The gyroscopic particles actually create a hydrauliceffect back to the atoms from which the gyroscopic particles come. This actionis mechanically similar to any hydraulic pumping system.

"The currentinput triggers the atom alignment which results in energy (gyroscopic particles) released from the atoms aligned. However, the electrical current inputdoes not participate in the magnetic field released."

H.    There is a most important distinction,however, between the power source of conventional hydraulic systems and thatwhich I have discovered and developed. The current (gyroscopic particles) whichcomes from a battery or generator is the energy which comprises the atoms of thematerials from which current (gyroscopic particles) comes. This action isliterally the mechanical essence of Einstein's Equation E = MC2.

Therefore, a batteryconnected to the proper output system will be destroyed in accordance with E =MC2! I am not referring to the present, inefficient chemicalreaction within a battery, since present teachings state that all energy producingdevices (which use current) operate via the current input only. This is nottrue!

Such presentteachings have resulted in designs for inefficient battery devices which are deliberntelyconstructed to use relatively high current. I teach the opposite. One shouldbuild devices to use as little current as possible and practical in order torestrict that current from completing the circuit and returning to the batteryor generator.

EXAMPLE: Let'sexamine a typical battery - an electrochemical cell. These devices operateaccording to Faraday's Laws. Faradav' s First Law states that the quantity ofelectricity that passes through a solution is proportional to the quantity ofsubstance decomposed. You will note that this action is solely dependent uponthe current (gyroscopic particles) completing the circuit. If the current(gyroscopic particles) does not complete the circuit, there will be no quantityof substance decomposed . (See Figures 16-H1 and 16 -H2.)

Re-examine the coilin Figure 15-B and then compare it to that in 16-H1 and 16-H2 above. Envisionthat if coil 16-H2 is composed of 5-gauge copper wire with such a length thatits resistance is 1,000,000 ohms and the battery voltage of 16-H1 is 1000volts, then only 1 milliamp of current could flow through coil 16-H2 andcomplete the circuit to return to battery 16-H1. It is obvious that the energywithin the magnetic field of coil 16-H2 would be tremendous, and, if thedirection of the current was reversed by a commutator (or similar mechanism) atposition (X) above,before the current of 1 M.A. passed through the coil, thenno decomposition of the battery by chemical means would occur. However, thehydraulic effect of the 1000 volts from battery 16-H1 would have alreadyaffected (catalytic effect) and aligned many atoms within coil 16-H2. Suchalignment would generate a tremendous magnetic field (gyroscopic particles).When the current was reversed within coil 16-H2 by the pressure of 1000 voltsfrom battery 16-H1,the induction effect would have far greater power than thatwhich originally came from battery 16-H1 on a chemical basis only. If you, thereader,have now mastered what I have taught, you will quickly recognize thatthe action- reaction effect within coil 16-H2 and the hydraulic effect ofbattery 16-H1 all operate in accordance with E = MC2.

In effect , thecurrent (consisting of flowing, gyroscopic particles) coming from the atoms ofcoil 16-H2 and battery 16-H1 are the mechanical essence of E=MC2and, consequently, the mass of the entire system will be reduced via E =MC2 asenergy is removed from the system. However , due to the high conversionefficiency within the process, it would actually require an extremely longperiod of time - measured in years - to significantly deplete the mass of thematerials involved in the system.

实际上，电流（由流动的陀螺子组成）来自于线圈16-H2和电池16-H1中的都是E=MC2的力学本质，因此，整个系统的质量将遵守E=MC2的方式减少并转换为能量。然而，由于这个过程转换效率如此之高，耗尽系统中的物质需要极长的时间（以年计），才能明显的测量出系统中损耗的质量。

It should be obviousto you that the electric current (gyroscopic particles) which emanates from theelements of battery 16-H1 is not depleted in coil 16-H2. If permitted, not onlywould the battery input current align the atoms of coil 16-H2, but once thecurrent returns to the battery, such current would,according to Faraday's FirstLaw, chemically decompose large quantities of matter compared to the minutesize of the current (in the form of gyroscopic particles) which activates theundesirable chemical reaction.

These gyroscopicparticles obey the First Law of Thermodynamics precisely: it appears they cannot be destroyed and it appears they possess amotion of infinite duration.

17. You, the reader,must now obtain the proper perspective within your mind. (See Figures 17-A and17-B.)

What distinction doyou instantly detect between Figures 17-A and 17-B? You should recognize thatone obtains greater energy from 17-B than from 17-A. You should recognize thisfact on a chemical basis. However, you should also see that this distinctionbetween Figures I 7-A and 17-B can also be visualized according to E = MC2 ifproperly understood and utilized .

Now examine Figures17-C and 17-D:

What is significantin Figure 18-A is the fact that when the small cylinder of niobium -tin alloyis removed from the liquid helium, the alloy instantly loses its formidable,magnetic field .

The reader shouldquickly recognize that in test 18-A, the niobium -tin alloy initially possessedenergy (heat) which was removed from its mass when placed in liquid helium .This heat loss instantly results in a large reduction of the random atom motionwithin the alloy and therefore a high percentage of the alloy's atoms thenalign to release some of their electromagnetic energy (gyroscopic particles)throughout the formidable, magnetic field created .

You can easily seethat this cryogenic process is opposite to the Curie temperature effect of heatinput (energy) into a permanent magnet resulting in atom unalignment , i.e.,increased random atom motion, and virtual disappearance of the magnet 's field.(See Figure 12-D2 on page 9 for comparison .)

If the small,cylindrical, niobium -tin alloy is removed from the liquid helium, then heat(energy) travels into its mass from the environment which results in asignificant increase in the random motion of the atoms within its mass. Thisaction creates the disappearance of the magnet's prior magnetic field since thegyroscopic particles which previously composed the magnetic field have nowreturned into the original atoms from which they came. [These results scientificallymatch those of test 12-D above.]

"... I stressthat it is essential that one design and establish the correct geometricconfiguration."

19. For optimalresults, I stress that it is essential that one design and establish thecorrect geometric configuration!  Withsuch a correct configuration , the atoms of the substances involved willintersect the gyroscopic particles (composing the magnetic field of the system)at the proper angle. In some designs it may be desirable that those atomswithin the system do not (or minimally) intersect the gyroscopic particles,i.e., in such instances, only gyroscopic particles should mechanically interactwith one another.

"One must paystrict attention to the mechanical essence of the gyroscopic action of theseparticles ...''

One must pay strictattention to the mechanical essence of the gyroscopic action of these particlesmoving in a magnetic field and emanating from the atoms of the substancesinvolved in the process. Such gyroscopic particles are the mechanical essenceof the equation E = MC2 . (See Figure 19-A.)

When a conductor isphysically moved down and across a magnetic field as in Figure 19-A , then thecurrent will change direction twice. The same is true if the conductor is movedfrom the South end of a magnet to the North end of the magnet. Reason: thedirection of gyroscopic action is changing throughout the "lines (shells)of force. " However, if a small, multi-looped, 38 -gaugeconducting-coil-wire [approximately 11/32-inch in diameter and 3/4-inch long]is moved across the end of a 6 inch diameter magnet, the current direction willalter four times. (See Figure 19-B.)

By moving the38-gauge, copper-wire coil across the end of the magnet (as shown in Figure19-B), the current direction will now change four times. [P = positive and N=negative.] It is extremely important to recognize that the "lines (shells)of force" (gyroscopic particles) continuously vary in their exact directionat any given moment. Study Figure 19-B1 above and observe that the angulardirection of the "lines (shells) of force" (gyroscopic particles)vary from the Center of the magnet to the left, in one plane of the magneticfield, and to the right, in the opposite side of that same plane .

Also observe that atthe points marked with a dot(•) in Figure 19-B above, there is no currentproduced even though the moving, small coil is never parallel with the"lines (shells) of force." Reason : This occurs as a result of acancellation effect, i.e., one side of the small coil is located within oneplane of gyroscopic particles possessing a given angular direction, while theopposite side of the small coil will be located in another plane of gyroscopicparticles possessing a different angular direction. The identical effect willbe observed if the small coil is moved from the North to the South end of themagnet .

The reader shouldunderstand that I did not observe the above results by accident. On the contrary,I utilized the small diameter coil because 'expected that it would moreeffectively detect the varying angles of the gyroscopic particles involved. Theresults I obtained totally corroborated my expectations. It should now beobvious to you that relative to a magnetic field , the angular directions ofthe gyroscopic particles are of extreme importance with respect to asubstance's given geometric design.

I would anticipatethat computer technology - which is pictorally capable of depicting themechanical essence of the action/reaction, gyroscopic effect of energies -wouldbe very helpful in predicting more efficient designs and in computing usefulmathematical formulas.

What should not bedone is for one to simply "throw together '' some design concept  and then place it in a magnetic field withoutgiving careful consideration to the mechanical essence of the energy of thatmagnetic field, i.e., the mechanical essence of the energy (in the form ofgyroscopic particles) comprising the atoms of the substance or substances ofthe design . Prior to my work, a lack of mechanical thought has been the norm,and, as the reader is well aware, the progress of science and the human racehas suffered.

I stress to you, thereader, that there are many designs which will effectively release the energyin a magnetic field in accordance with the conversion of the mass from whichthe magnetic field emanates via E = MC2.

The electromagneticcomposition of the atoms of materials which initiates an input current flow isconstant, is similar to hydraulic pressure, and appears to move at the speed oflight. In addition, such input current behaves solely as a catalyst ininteracting with the electromagnetic nature of the atoms comprising other materialsand caused such atoms to release a portion of their electromagnetic energy inthe form of a magnetic field composed of gyroscopic particles. Such actionincreases the capacity of the system for performing "Obvious" or"Unobvious" Work, Force, or Power. The system can then react withanother magnetic force or the atoms (gyroscopic particles) of that source tomultiply this electromagnetic effect even further.

Let 's examine thefacts which corroborate the previous statement:

A.  I havealready proven that the greater the number of atoms aligned within a magnet,the greater the release of the magnet's energy (gyroscopic particles) inaccordance with the equation E = MC2 . (See Figures 20-A1, 20-A2, and 20-A3.)

C. I have alreadyproven that one should perceive the individual atoms (of Figures 20-A3 and20-B3) as microscopic batteries with an energy capacity equivalent to E = MC2 .Realizing these facts, one then knows that the greater the number of atoms ofany substance which one activates in accordance with these teach ings, then thegreater the energy release that can be expected. (See Figures 20-A3 and 20-B3.)

Refer back to Figure15-B (on page 19) and imagine that Figure 20-B3 is of similar magnitude. Also,imagine Figure 20-A3 of proportional size and magnitude with Figure 20-B3. Ifthese two systems (20-A3 and 20-B3) then react with one another, you willobtain the following: (See Figures 20-C1 and 20-C2.)

One can easilyenvision a conductor coil 20-C 1 being the size of a domed stadium, and amagnet 20-C2 being larger than a giant redwood tree.

In some cases, itmay be desirable to permit the gyroscopic particles emanating from magnet 20-C2to efficiently interact with the gyroscopic particles surrounding theconducting coil 20-C1, but not to interact with the atoms contained within theconducting coil 20-C1 itself. With the proper mechanical configurationutilizing the gyroscopic particles, one would achieve maximum torque withmagnet 20-C2 without creating back - emf or induction into conducting coil 20-C1.

The reader must alsorealize that there is a hydraulic, "magnetic -coupling effect " ofthe gyroscopic particles comprising the magnetic fields -an effect whichextends back to the atoms of the material from which the gyroscopic particlesemanate. As a result, the Archimedian "Laws of Leverage" are enacted!

Knowing these facts,one can easily see that in Figures 20-C1 and 20-C2 there would be a phenomenaltorque produced upon the masses of both 20-Cl and 20-C2. This phenomenal torqueis the result of E = MC2!

D. EXAMINE THESEFACTS: The massive number of atoms within conducting coil 20-C1 produce aphenomenal back-emf (power) which is greater than the external energy input(consisting of a catalytic effect only) or external power input. In addition,the massive number of atoms within magnet 20-C2 release via atom alignment alarge quantity of kinetic energy (in the form of a magnetic field) whichinteracts with another large quantity of kinetic energy (in the form of amagnetic field) within conducting coil 20-C1. Such interactions result in aphenomenal torque effect and either 20-C1 or 20-C2 (or both) could  rotate .

"The greaterthe voltage (hydraulic pressure), then the greater the number of atoms of aconductor will be triggered into the desired action. "

Observe that theabove mechanical configuration has multiplied the capacity of the system toperform "Obvious" or "Unobvious " Work, Force, or Powerrelative to the intial power input which acts only as a catalyst.

Now, envisionanother conducting coil of proportional size which acts as a generator and isphysically positioned to efficiently interact mechanically with 20-Cl and20-C2. This configuration will increase the energy output even further.

Such a configurationis exactly what I created with my primitive , handmade prototype. The prototypewas not built for my benefit, but for the benefit of others who had beenunjustly influenced by a teaching process which rewards memorization. It wasalso built for those who could not or would not recognize the validity of myTheoretical Process. (Again I refer to the discussion in 15-C and Figure 15-Cl.) All of the results described above were observed in the primitive prototype(described in 15-C and 15-Cl) except that the generating coil had only 300 lbs.of atoms. For more impressive results , the prototype should have contained4,200 lbs. of atoms. I specifically limited the coil weight to 300 lbs.,however, because I knew that high voltage would occur and that electrical-resistance-breakdown could also happen if the coil size became too great. These problemsare technical problems which can easily be solved by present technology .

The reader shouldclearly understand by now that if the electric current which is initiallyreleased from a battery is not permitted (by a conducting coil) to complete thecircuit within the coil itself , then the total electromagnetic energy(gyroscopic particles) contained within the conducting coll will performexactly as I teach. Ideally, one should construct the energy machine to havevoltage (hydraulic pressure), but the input cur rent should (as much aspractical) be prevented from returning to the battery, generator, etc. Thatcurrent which flows from the conducting coil could indeed return to the batteryand recharge it.

E. One could reducethe length of a conductor and still achieve the desired results by simplyincreasing the speed of the "on" and "off' input current whichbehaves as a pulsating flow. The atoms of the conductor will produce a back-emfflow as a result of the expanding and collapsing magnetic field (composed ofgyroscopic particles). These atoms are "triggered '' into this observable,back -emf flow via the "catalytic" action of the small, initial inputcurrent.

The greater thevoltage (hydraulic pressure), then the greater the number of atoms of aconductor which will be triggered into the desired action.

However, thisstatement should be qualified: the facts indicate that all atoms have a"threshold effect." If the "threshold effect" of the atoms(contained within a given diameter and length of a conductor) are exceeded,then the atoms will emit some of their electromagnetic composition (gyroscopicparticles) in the form of heat with the result that the magnetic field would begreatly reduced. If this occurs, then one should simply increase the diameterof the conductor or increase the speed of the pulsating input current.

Returning ,to theprototype in Figure 15-C1: this massive 5-gauge coil had only eight (8) ohms ofresistance , yet it produced a tremendous back-emf (power) which reducedcurrent-flow-input from the battery pack. When the input power from the batterypack was interrupted , the back -emf then returned more power than the originalpower input from the battery pack.

There are thoseindividuals who will ask the question: "Why can't one simply feed thegenerated, output current back into itself, eliminating the need for an inputbattery? " The answer is simple: The energy involved in this system(consisting of gyroscopic particles) is composed of real, mechanical entitieswhich will work against themselves (as would unaligned gears) just as readilyas they will work together in utilizing or generating power. (See Figure 21-A.)

A.    Envision that the above two magnets inFigure 21-A have a strong, magnetic field that is capable of compressing thespring. One would not expect the spring to then recoil and push the two magnetsapart.

Reason: Thegyroscopic particles emanating from the atoms of the two magnets are themechanical essence of E = MC2 and, consequently, such particles will keep thespring compressed. However, if one has a "triggering mechanism " or acatalytic effect that causes the atoms of one or both of the two magnets toalign and unalign, then the spring would recoil, pushing the two masses apart.When the atoms are aligned, the spring would again be compressed via thegeneration of the magnetic field by the aligned atoms. This process wouldcontinue to repeat itself.

B.    A similar effect (created by the gyroscopicparticles via E = MC2) is observed when the current is prohibited fromreturning to a conventional generator. If a mechanical means is constructed to"trap" the electric current and prevent it from completing a circuit,then the gyroscopic particles of the current have a capacity for continuouswork without the necessity to increase the power input from the generatorsystem. However , if the circuit is complete and the electric current movingwithin the System performs no "Obvious" Work, Force, or Power, thenthe gyroscopic particles comprising the current will - upon returning to thegenerator -increase the need for greater power input into the system. Reason:Such action occurs as a result of the very fact that these gyroscopic particlesare literally the "mechanical essence of E = MC2" and it appears theycannot be destroyed. This fact results in these gyroscopic particles having a"cumulative effect." (See Figure 21-B1 and Figure 21-B2.)

InFigures 21-B1 and 21-B2, the depicted motor also acts as a generator. In 21-B1,if the leads are shorted out with only  1ohm of resistance in the generator's conductor, there will be a resistive forceequal to the pull -force that one exerts in pulling the pull-cord attached tothe pulley on the motor (generator) shaft. Reason: The conductor cuts themagnetic field of the permanent magnets, thereby releasing gyroscopic particles(current) from the magnetic field. These released, gyroscopic particles whichtravel into the conductor then have their spin at right angles to the balanceof gyroscopic particles (spin) remaining in the magnetic field which in turngenerates an opposing ''Obvious Force. '' These gyroscopic particles continueto move throughout the shorted conductor as the conductor continually movesthrough additional "lines (shells) of force" within the magneticfield which, in turn, results in even more gyroscopic particles (current) beingreleased within the conductor. This successive number of gyroscopic -particle -releases is what creates the ''cumulative effect. ''

"This successive number of gyroscopic- particle-releases iswhat creates the 'cumulative effect. '"

Onecan easily prove this previous statement to be a fact by simply conducting anexperiment. Observe that the harder one pulls on the "pull-cord" (inFigure 21-B1), the more the resistive force will equal your pull. [Frictionalforce is additional.]One can therefore easily observe that one is producing no''Obvious Work, Force, or Power “outside the system.

Observeabove Figure 21-B in which five smaller, permanent -magnet motors have beenplaced in series. When one pulls the pull-cord, one finds that the requiredenergy is significantly less than in Figure 21-B1 and yet all five additionalmotors will now be running. One is now producing '' Obvious Work, Force, andPower" outside of the system and yet one is using significantly less inputpower. Why the difference? Answer: In Figure 21-B1, one is producing highcurrent (volume of gyroscopic particles which acts as a "brake") andvirtually no hydraulic pressure (voltage). However, in Figure 21-B2, one isproducing high hydraulic pressure (voltage) and low current (volume ofgyroscopic particles completing the circuit), therefore, the "brakingeffect" is drastically reduced.

Lenz'sLaw states that "the current induced in a circuit due to a change in themagnetic flux through it or to its motion in a magnetic field is so directed asto oppose the change in flux or to exert a mechanical force opposing themotion.”

Lenz'sLaw is simply an observation of this cumulative effect of the gyroscopic-particle-spin (comprising the current produced) being at right angles to thespin of the gyroscopic particles remaining in the magnetic field.  Prior to my work, the true nature of themagnetic field has never been fully understood.

Returningto the question , "Why can 't one simply feed the generated, outputcurrent back into itself?" l would answer: If one blindly (via mechanicalimplicitness) feeds the current produced from a system back into itself , thena "braking effect" will occur which will negate the desired results.

Itshould be obvious to the reader that the prior teachings have indicated thatall power produced from any type of conducting system was the result of currentflow and was not from the conducting system itself. As a result of this view,all prior systems have been deliberately designed to utilize high current-flowto produce high power.

Ifyou have mastered my teachings up to this point, then you should be principallyinterested in the voltage (hydraulic pressure), since the current (gyroscopicparticles) simply acts as a catalyst for any system into which it flows. As Iindicated above, the gyroscopic particle composition of the current cannot bedepleted as it moves through the system. As a result, the current completes thecircuit to the generator and a "braking-action” occurs to create thecumulative effect. If the current was to complete the circuit and return to thebattery, then such current would, according to Faraday's Law of Electrolysis(which depends upon current flow (gyroscopic particles]), produce an undesiredchemical action and destroy one's ability to utilize the elements of thebattery in accordance with E = MC2 .

Thevery electrolytic action described by Faraday's Law is proof that the currentwithin the system has not been depleted. With a correct technical system, suchcurrent could be harnessed for more productive purposes since the gyroscopicparticles (which comprise the current) have an infinite capacity for work.

Viathe proper design, it is obvious that one can feed the energy triggered andreleased from a system into a configuration which then operates itself andproduces additional, excess energy in accordance with E = MC2 by converting themass of the system involved.

Thisis exactly what I have clearly demonstrated by utilizing the primitive,handmade prototypes already discussed. (See Figures 15-C1 and 15-C2.) There aremany additional, technical designs possible which will be built by following mybasic principles.

22.    I now wish to give you, the reader, a test.Have you understood literally what I have taught you? Or have you simply soughtto memorize what I have written?  I wishto stimulate you to understand the very "essence" of what I teachyou! Only by doing so will you be able to "stand on my shoulders and seefarther than I have.''*

Question:How would you build a more efficient design than the primitive prototypes Ihave already demonstrated? What properties would you seek to perfect in yoursystem?

Youshould understand that if built structurally strong, even the 15-C1 and 15-C2prototypes would produce an impressive power output if the hydraulic pressure(voltage) was increased. For example, in the smaller 15-C2 unit, I utilizedonly 300 volts of pressure due to the fact that as one increases the voltage(hydraulic pressure) then the power produced becomes damaging to the primitivecommutator which I built by hand. Utilizing these 300 volts, I had only 1.6milliamps input and a 14 lb. magnet which rotated at approximately 200 RPM.Now, if you add 100,000 volts (hydraulic pressure) to a system structurallydesigned to withstand the voltage -which is 333 times the original voltage Iutilized to demonstrate my correct principle-then one can expect the poweroutput to be in thousands of watts with an input of only several hundred watts.With such a system, the 14 lb. magnet would rotate at more than 50,000 RPM!

WhatI continually stress to you, the reader is that the handmade prototypes weresimply built to prove that the Technical Process which I teach is correct. Iconsider the Technical (Theoretical) Process to be 10,000 times more importantthan those primitive prototypes. If you have mastered what I teach, then themagnitude of this "ioneering Invention" should be obvious to you.