本帖最后由 火凤凰 于 2014-7-4 05:28 编辑


改变图14-B1中的电流方向，磁场将迅速改变。之后断开电流如图14-B2磁场将迅速消失，在铜材料中没有残余的幸亏被观察到。如果一个人拿一个磁体靠近铜，没有明显的磁现象。因此，人们非常容易的被欺骗了，因为传统的磁体的材料会有一个不同的结果。例如：

Byplacing an iron core within a copper coil (as in Figure 14-B3) and turning thecurrent on, a significantly stronger magnetic field will be generated than inFigure 14-B1 [for the same energy input]. Now, turn off the current as inFigure 14-B4 and there will be a small, remnant magnetic field surrounding theiron core. If a magnet is placed near the iron core, the magnet will be visiblyaffected. However, one is easily deceived by these tests and can be misleadinto believing that copper is non-magnetic. This is exactly what happened toHans Christian Oersted in 1820 when he first discovered that an electriccurrent produced a magnetic field which would cause a magnet to align at rightangles to the conducting wire. Oersted noted that the deflection of the magnetlasted only as long as the current was flowing through the conducting wire andhence, such magnetic action could not be caused by the (copper) wire, but mustbe a result of the current itself. This same incorrect conclusion is stillrigidly taught to this day.

Thefollowing facts will clearly prove that copper is bigbly magnetic relative tothe speed of atom alignment/unalignment as well as the action /reaction effectof the energy release (in the form of the gyroscopic particles previouslydiscussed) from the atoms comprising the copper wire!

"The prior teachings indicate that copper isnon-magnetic and that the resulting magnetic field associated with current flowin copper is the result of the current. Those teachings are totally wrong.Copper is extremely magnetic! It is so magnetic that it deceives theobserver."
原有的教学指出铜是没有磁性的，磁场和铜中电流的关系是电流的结果。这种学说是完全错误的。铜是极具磁性的！它的磁性强到误导了观察者。
现有技术教授：假设，如果强加进入纯自感（铜）导体线圈的电流，和开始输入（铜）导体线圈中的同样的电流将返回。（看图14-C1和14-C2。）


[*This processis in no way limited to copper. Actually, one can utilize any suitablematerials for conducting, e.g., super-conducting materials such as niobium tin,etc.]
这个过程中不只可以用铜。实际上，可以用任何合适的导体材料，如超导材料铌锡等。

Physicallyspeaking, this simply means that the energy contained within the magnetic field- when generated by positive (+) current flow in one direction - is returned bythe collapsing magnetic field as negative ( -) current flow when the currentflow reverses direction.

D.    ThePrior Art also teaches Kirchhoff’s Law which states:  the same amount of current placed into asystem (as a copper conductor) for a given-instant of time has the same amountof current flowing from that system (copper conductor) for the same given-instant of time. (See Figure 14-D.)
现有技术也教基尔霍夫法则，法则规定：瞬间输入系统（如铜导体）的电流和流出系统（如铜导体）的电流一样多（看图14-D）。



The above FACTS of 14C and 14D totallycontradict the prior teaching that the magnetic field generated by the currentflowing in a (copper) conductor is solely a result of the current itself andthat copper is non-magnetic.
Lookat the facts and open your mind!
上述14C和14D的事实与这个是矛盾的（磁场只是电流流过（铜）导体产生的电流本身的结果，铜完全没有磁性！）
思考这个事实，开放你的思想！

Thefacts demonstrate the following: 14C above shows that if one inputs a givenamount of current (X) into a copper coil during a given-instant of time then,as described in I4D above, the same amount of current (X) outputs from thecopper coil during the same instant of time. In addition, 14C above also showsthat if the current is then cut off and the coil shorted with meters in theline, then the same amount of current (X) will now come from the copper coil.

Thefacts therefore demonstrate: (X) current in and(X) current out plus (X) currentout again when the (X) current input is stopped. These facts are thereforeequivalent to 1 (X) amount of current into the coil (copper) and 2 (X) amountof current out of the (copper) coil.

QUESTION: From where did the extra (X)amount of current coming from the copper coil emanate?
ANSWER: By analogy, the Prior Teachings indicate that current is equivalent tothe volume of water and that voltage is equivalent to the pressure of water.Therefore, one should understand the essence of this analogy relative to thefacts discussed above. (See Figures 14-E1 and 14-E2.)
问题：从铜线圈中产生的额外的（X）数量电流是从哪来的?
回答：通过分析，原来的教学暗示电流可以比作水的量，电压可以比作水压。因此，一个人应该明白对于上面讨论的的事实的分析的本质，（看图14-E1和14-E2。）



图片中翻译：
14-E1
1加仑电流输入线圈，2加仑电流输出线圈。
14-E2
1加仑水进入水管，最大输出1加仑水从水管中。
也有一些人无视这样解释，磁场是等效与水的压力的。那样的解释是完全错误的，甚至与熟知的水力学原理相背，因为一旦增加每秒的流量，也应增加实体的流动速度，从而他的压力减少。

Thefacts clearly demonstrate that in Figure 14-E1 , one "gallon" of currentcame from the copper coil Itself and most definitely not from the initial one"gallon" of current put into the copper coil. (This is an analogyonly. The mass or volume of the electric current input or output cannot be seenor weighed because it is composed of gyroscopic particles and is the mechanicalessence of E = MC2.)

F.    ThePrior Teachings distort the above facts and would indicate that the analogy ofone "gallon " of current has no pressure when coming from the coil inFigure 14-E1 , and that one "gallon" of current has a pressure whichis thereby equivalent to one "gallon" of current with the inputpressure. Furthermore, such teachings would indicate that because of theresistance within the coil and other losses, not even the latter pressure willoccur in reality.
原来的学说歪曲了上述事实，指出这样类似的，来自图14-E1的线圈的，一“加仑”电流，是没有压力的。而一“加仑”的输入电流有一“加仑”的压力。而且，这样的学说还指出因为线圈电阻的存在和其它损失，实际中后续的压力将不会发生。

EvenI was mislead by these teachings for many years, and I finally came to therealization that copper was highly magnetic by a completely different meansthan outlined above. These means included: (1) my general comprehension whichoriginated with my recognition that the basic building block of all mattermatter was the gyroscopic particle , and (2) a test I conducted using a singlepiece of copper wire 800 feet long, which was doubled-back 400 feel to the startingpoint and hooked to a meter and dry cell battery. (See Figures 14-Fl and14-F2.)

虽然我也被这些常说误导了很多年，最终我认识到铜是有很强磁性的，和上面概括的完全不同的方式的磁。这包括：（1）物质的基石是陀螺子的原始认知，（2）一个我设计的实验，只用了800英尺长的铜线和一节干电池，铜线有400英尺折叠回来到起点，连接到仪表和干电池。

Thetest shown in Figure 14-F1 has the parallel positions of the wire 10 feetapart, with no "Unobvious Force" between the parallel portions of thewire. The test shown in Figure 14-F2 has the parallel portions of the wireextremely close, with an "Unobvious Force" between the parallel paresof the single wire.

Theresults of these two tests demonstrated the same current input for both tests.Prior to these results I had recognized that the words "Work ,""Force," and "ower " are implicit engineering statementsand do not represent precise, scientific terms based upon observational reality. I conceptually altered such macroscopic, engineering statements to"Obvious work," "Obvious Force," and "Obvious Power.'I would microscopically describe what occurs internally, with in matter as"Unobvious Work," "Unobvious Force," and "UnobviousPower. " (I will explain these concepts later in this Book.) Such semanticclarification enabled me to know - upon completing the above tests in Figures14-Fl and 14-F2 -that copper is extremely magnetic.

G.    Returningto the above test of Figure l 4-E1 and14-E2: by my teaching, the facts clearlyshow that in the above analogy, one gallon of current "matter"(consisting of gyroscopic particles) was released from the atoms of the coppercoil! This extra one gallon of current (gyroscopic particles) comes from thecomponent parts of the atoms comprising the copper coil and simply utilizesEinstein’s Equation of E = MC2.(I must stress that this is ananalogy only. The volume or mass of matter via the gyroscopic particlesrepresents the mechanics of E=MC2 and such particles cannot be seenor weighed by conventional means. Their existence can be inferred, however, basedon their mechanical behavior combined with known, observational faces.)
QUESTION: How can this extra one gallon of current exist?
回到图14-F1和14-F2的实验：通过我的教学，事实清楚的表明上面的类比，一加仑电流“物质”（由陀螺子组成）从铜线圈的原子中释放！这额外的一加仑电流（陀螺子）来自组成铜线圈的原子的组成部分，简单的利用了E = MC2等式。（我必须强调这只是类比。物质的数量和质量通过陀螺子表现为E=MC2 的构成，这样的微粒不能通过传统的方法看到或称重。然而，它们的存在能基于它们和已知可观察现象关联的力学行为推断出来。）
问题：这多出来的一加仑电流如何存在?
ANSWER: The current input (gyroscopic particles) simply acts as a catalystrelative to the atoms comprising the copper coil- atoms which align and unalignextremely fast compared to the atoms of conventional, magnetic materials-thereby releasing virtually immeasurable portions of the gyroscopic particlescomprising the atoms of the coil. This release generates the magnetic field.When the input current is turned off, the collapsing (gyroscopic particles ofthe) magnetic field within the coil results in the gyroscopic particlesattempting to return to the atoms from which they initially emanated. Suchmechanical action results in the gyroscopic particles striking other atoms withinthe copper coil at some degree of a right angle and moving at right angles tothat force. This gyroscopic motion explains the source for the additional"one gallon" of current (gyroscopic particles) discussed in the abovewater analogy. Because of the "conversion efficiency" of this processvia E = MC2, there will be no observable change in the mass of thecopper coil even after decades of use.
回答：输入电流（陀螺子）简单表现为组成铜线圈原子的催化剂-铜原子与传统材料原子相比可以极快的重排或失序-由此释放无法计量的组成线圈原子的陀螺子。这种释放产生了磁场。当输入电流断开，线圈中磁场（陀螺子）的崩溃导致陀螺子试图返回最初发出它们的原子。这样的运动导致陀螺子以一定程度成直角撞击到铜线圈中其它原子，并在直角的方向上移动。陀螺运动解释了上面以水类比讨论时多出的“一加仑”电流（陀螺子）的来源。因为这个进程“转换效率”等于E = MC2，铜线圈的物质方面将没有明显的改变，即使用了几十年。
"Suchmechanical action results in the gyroscopic particles striking other atomswithin the copper coil at some degree of a right angle and moving at rightangles to that force."
这样的力学运动导致陀螺子在直角方向以一定程度撞击到铜线圈中其它原子，并在直角的方向上移动。

Ishould add that there is an important conceptual distinction between twomeanings of the word "efficiency." To state that a given invention is8.2 efficient, i.e., it produces over eight times as much energy as itconsumes, is different from stating that the invention is 100 percentefficient, i.e., it completely converts the gyroscopic particles within themagnet from "magnet mass " to electrical energy. The former processinvolves production efficiency and the latter process involves conversionefficiency.

15.  Now to discuss the practical usage for thisnew understanding of the gyroscopic particles which are the mechanical essenceof the equation E = MC2 and comprise the component parts of theatoms within all matter, conductors, and copper. By understanding the teachings(of this Pioneering Invention), one can build a physical embodiment of thisPioneering Invention by using a conducting coil which will produce more energyout of the system than that put into the system from an outside source such asbattery, generator , etc.

现在讨论关于陀螺子新理解的实际应用，陀螺子是E = MC2等式的力学本质，是所有物质、导体和铜的原子的组成部分。通过理解教学（关于这个开创性发明），可以建造一个这个开创性发明的物理实现，通过用一个导体线圈输出多于输入系统的能量，输入能量来自外部电源如电池，发电机等。

Iwish to thank Dr. Roger Hastings, Senior Physicist for Sperry-Univac, forcalculating by conventional mathematics the quantitative measurements for the followingtest which I had proposed. Dr. Hastings is an exceptional scientist who had thecharacter to come forth in my behalf when many others were fearful orclose-minded.

For"mind-opening purposes" (to use the current vernacular) carefullystudy the following two tests:

A.       Take 40-gauge copper wire whichhas a resistance of 1,049 Ohms for 1000 feet with a total weight (of atomscomposed of gyroscopic particles) of a mere .02993 lbs., turning same into acoil with a 10-foot interior diameter and 8.32 feet in height. One wouldtherefore have approximately a mere 31.8 turns of copper wire (copper atoms,i.e., gyroscopic particles). (See Figure 15-A.)

用电阻为1049欧40-gauge的铜线（总重由陀螺子组成的原子0.02993磅1000英尺长）（gauge是一个单位，40-gauge应该不到2mm），绕制成10英尺内直径8.32英尺高的线圈。这将大约仅仅31.8圈铜线。（看图15-A）

If100 volts is connected to coil 15-A, then a current flow of approximately 95MAwould occur with total power input of 9.5 watts and a resulting weak, magneticfield of .012 Gauss or a mere .0000 14 Joules of energy stored in this weak,magnetic field.

如果100伏特连接到15-A中的线圈，之后产生一个大约95MA（100/1049＝0.0953A）的电流，总能量输入是9.5瓦特，导致一个微弱的0.12高斯的磁场或仅仅.0000 14焦耳(1/2*L*I ^2)的能量存储在这个弱磁场中。

Aninsignificant current flow would now occur if the current input was stopped andcoil 15-A was shorted-out to collapse a weak magnetic field and provide aninductance of only .003 Henries.

B.    Now,conduct another test with 5-gauge copper wire which has a resistance of .3133Ohms for 1000 feet. However, to equal the same resistance as in 15-A above, onemust now use 3,348,000 feet of 5-gauge wire with a massive, total weight (ofatoms composed of gyroscopic particles moving and traveling at the speed oflight, i.e., the mechanical essence of Einstein 's Equation E = MC2)of 335,469.6 lbs. or 16.77 tons. Such wire is turned into a coil with a 10-footinterior diameter and 8.32-foot height. This structure would have approximatelya phenomenal 90,000 turns of 5-gauge (copper atoms). If 100 volts were nowconnected to coil 15-B (see drawing below), then a current flow ofapproximately 95MA could occur with a total power input of 9.5 watts and aresulting, phenomenally larger magnetic field of 23.7 Gauss, or 1,905 timeslarger for coil 15-B than for coil 15-A, and 116 Joules of energy stored in themagnetic field of Figure 15-B below. This represents a phenomenal 8 milliontimes more energy than in the 40-gauge coil of 15-A above.
注：美国的线规：5# 对应为外径4.62mm。40#对应外径为0.079mm。直径相比为58.5倍。
现在，实现另一个实验，用1000英尺.3133欧的5-gauge铜线圈。然而，为了与15-A有相同的电阻，现在必须用3,348,000英尺 5-gauge的铜线，（由光速运动的符合E = MC2力学本质的陀螺子组成的原子）总重335,469.6磅或16.77吨。将这样的线圈绕成10英尺内径8.32英尺高。这个结构大约90,000圈5-gauge铜线。如果100伏特连接到15-B的线圈（看下图），之后产生一个大约95MA 的电流，总能量输入是9.5瓦特，导致一个23.7高斯的明显的磁场区域，或比15-A中的线圈大1905倍，116焦耳能量存储在15-B中的磁场中。这显示出比15-A中40-gauge线圈多明显的8百万倍的能量。

Aphenomenally larger current flow would now occur if the current input wasstopped and coil 15-B was shorted-out as a result of the collapsing, muchgreater magnetic field of the 5-gauge wire in coil 15-B. Such shorting wouldgenerate an inductance of 25,700 Henries, which is better than 8 million timesthe inductance of the 40-gauge coil in Figure 15-A above.

Clearly,these facts - combined with the above FACTS 1 through 14 - prove beyond anydoubt that Oersted's conclusion in 1820 (which is still taught to this day):"that the magnetic field came only from the current and not theconductor" to be totally false. [Although his conclusion is incorrect, Iremain grateful to Hans Christian Oersted for being the first to notice andattempt to explain an observed connection between an electric current and amagnetic field.)

Whencoupled with FACTS 1 through 14, tests 15-A and 15-B clearly prove that the phenomenaldifference in strength for the resulting magnetic fields (implying greatdifferences in stored energy) and additional current flow when the inputcurrent was stopped (inductance), had to come from the gyroscopic particlescomprising the component parts of the atoms within the copper coil.

Thecurrent flow input was the same in both tests, but the number of atoms (lbs. ofcopper) varied considerably from test 15-A to test 15-B correlating preciselywith the phenomenal difference in the strength of magnetic fields produced, theextreme difference in the stored energy (gyroscopic particles), and the greatdifference (inductance) in the additional current flow produced when the inputcurrent was stopped in test 15-A and test 15-B. These phenomenal differencesrepresent the mechanical essence of E = MC2: gyroscopic particles.

Allof the above FACTS 1 through 15 scientifically establishes the position thatthe mathematical formulas employed in the calculation of the energy within amagnetic field (intended to represent the potential energy or stored energy ofJoules in a magnetic field) are totally incorrect. The FACTS above clearlyindicate that the magnetic field consists of gyroscopic -type particles whichare the mechanical essence of E = MC2 and represent an orderly flowof kinetic energy.

注：哪个公式？估计说的是W＝0.5*L*I^2.  后面再翻译可能了解他在说什么。

Iwill go further and stare that "potential" energy, as such, does notexist! All energy is kinetic in nature, since the gyroscopic particlescontinue, under all conditions, to move and spin at the speed of light inaccordance with E = MC2.

Theabove FACTS prove beyond question that the proper mathematical equation(concerning the "kinetic" energy which makes up a magnetic field) musebe relative to E = MC2. A proper mathematical equation wouldrecognize that the "Unobvious Force "produced represents the Joulesof the "Unobvious Power' activated at that instant-in-time and as so usedwould diminish the mass of the source of the magnetic field via a 100% utilization(conversion efficiency) of Einstein’s Equation E = MC2, since the magneticfield consists of kinetic energy having a gyroscopic action which representsthe mechanical essence of E = MC2.

''... the magnetic field consists of gyroscopic-type particles whichare the mechanical essence of E = MC2 and represent an orderly flow of kineticenergy. "

Ileave the task of determining the nature of such equations to a thinking,questioning mathematical mind, as I do not have the mathematical expertise. Itshould be noted, however, that -the mechanical comprehension of a naturalphenomenon has often historically preceded a mathematical model. James ClerkMaxwell acknowledged the importance of Michael Faraday’s mechanical andexperimental abilities.

Maxwellalso recognized that such mechanical aptitude constituted a major intellectualinput to his later mathematical theories. In his paper 'On Faraday's Lines ofForce,' read before the Cambridge Philosophical Society on December 10, 1855and February 11, 1856, Maxwell explicitly stated his debt to Faraday:

"Themethods are generally those suggested by the processes of reasoning which are foundin the researches of Faraday, and which, though they have been interpretedmathematically by Prof Thomson and others, are very generally supposed to be onan indefinite and unmathematical character, when compared with those employedby the professed mathematicians. By the method which I adopt, I hope to renderit evident that I am not attempting to establish any physical theory of ascience in which I have hardly made a single experiment, and that the limit ofmy design is to shew bow, by a strict application of the ideas and methods ofFaraday, the connexion of the very different orders of phenomena which he hasdiscovered may be clearly placed before the mathematical mind. "*

A.       In 1979, I filed a patent forthis Pioneering Invention of which several embodiments have been taught and disclosedsince that time. The use of a conducting coil is one of those embodiments andthe original parent and continuing patent applications were filed before anyphysical prototypes based on the Theory were built. The physical prototypeswere thereafter built for the benefit of others, not for myself, since I knewsuch prototypes would operate as I had predicted. Scientifically, one shouldfind pertinent the fact chat when these prototypes were constructed, theyperformed exactly as I had conceptually predicted in the patent applicationsfor this Pioneering Invention.

Seebelow picture 15-C1 featuring one of these early prototypes utilizing 5-gauge,insulated copper wire with a total weight of approximately 4,200 lbs. of copperatoms (or over two tons), 300 lbs. of No. 30

Gaugecopper wire (atoms) wrapped over the outside of the 5-gauge wire (atoms), and apermanent magnet containing approximately 600 lbs. of atoms (or slightly lesschat 1/3 of a ton). [l am deliberately referring to the wire as"atoms" and describing the magnet as 600 lbs. of "atoms" inorder to accustom the reader to a mechanical perspective concerning the natureof the action of the gyroscopic particles contained within all atoms.]

Themassive, permanent magnet had an approximate 20-inch diameter and was slightlyless than 4 feet long. The large, conducting copper coil had an approximate l.D of 4 feet, was approximately 3 feet in height, and was wrapped upon a largefiberglass tube. The total weight of the system was approximately 5,000 lbs.

大永磁体有一个大约20英寸的直径，刚不到4英尺长。大铜导体线圈大约4英尺直径，大约3英尺高，绕在大玻璃纤维管上。系统总重大约5000磅。

Thephotographs shown in 15-C1 simply represent a primitive, handmade prototype made(in the backwoods of Lucedale, Mississippi, by me and my lovely, devotee! wife)to prove to others that the Technical (Theoretical) Process which l originallydeveloped and taught is correct. I consider the Technical Process to be 10,000times more important that the primitive working prototypes.

Withonly 1.5 watts input, the back power (emf) produced would generate a spark atthe commutator of such heat magnitude that the back power would, in 2 shortperiod of time, explode and destroy a ceramic insulator from a 5-watt resistorplaced on the commutator at the point of current reversal. Dr. Roger Hastingsestimated the back emf to be in excess of 80,000 watts.

Therotating, handmade, 600 lb. (of atoms), 4-foot magnet permitted a slow RPM. At200 RPM it was calculated by others that the centrifugal force would be 10,000lbs. of force attempting to pull the magnet apart.

Everyonewho initially viewed the massive unit in 15-C1 above was then asked thequestion: "Based on your expertise, how much power would be necessary tosimply operate this device mechanically?” Answer: from 200 to 1000 watts. Otherskilled individuals - upon learning that the unit had only copper in the coil -statedthat in their expert opinion, the unit would be highly inefficient since itcontained no iron core.

However,the facts pertaining to the unit's operation in 15-C1 do clearly prove that theunit could operate on less than 3/2 watts and that it was phenomenally efficient,i.e., far in excess of I00% production efficiency relative to the power out ofthe system compared to the external power into the system, and exactly 100%conversion efficiency relative to the conversion of the mass (gyroscopic particles)of copper atoms to electrical and rotational energy output.

Imust stress that this process is not "perpetual motion." Anyone whofollows my teachings is simply convening (on a 100% conversion efficiencybasis) mass into energy via a 100% (or more) production efficiency process.Therefore, the energy out of the total system is equivalent to the small amountof electrical energy input (acting as a pure catalyst) plus the extant magneticenergy (in the form of gyroscopic particles) within the system. Due to this lattercombination of energies, it may be said that the external energy output isgreater than the external energy input.

"The energy out of the total system is equivalent to the smallamount of electrical energy input (acting as a pure catalyst) plus the extantmagnetic energy (in the form of gyroscopic particles) within the system."

Iwill again turn to Dr. Roger Hastings (Senior Physicist with Sperry- Univac)who has conducted more tests on different occasions upon my working prototypesthan anyone else. I reemphasize the point that Dr. Hastings is an exceptionalscientist who has courage and the true scientific attitude. As a result, hecame forth in my behalf when many others were frightened or close-minded.

Theverification of the operation of the unit in 15-C1 above, as well as ocherprototypes, and rile qualitative scientific ability and fortitude of Dr. Hastingsare clearly demonstrated via the test described in Chapter Five. Such a healthy,scientific attitude is even more exemplified by the fact that Dr. Hastings wenton record as having once had the attitude that, before he traveled to Lucedaleto meet me, to listen to my concepts, and co conduct tests, he was of the beliefthat he would be confronting a "crack-pot inventor." Fortunately, Dr.Hastings' skepticism was tempered with genuine curiosity. I have discovered thatwithout such curiosity, skepticism will rapidly decay into cynicism.

Dr.Roger Hastings' statements and tests follow.